Tweet
Is Pope Francis a Communist?
It is pure Marxism that comes out of the mouth of the Pope. Pope Francis grew up in socialist Argentina, so it is part of his birthright, just like the South America illegals migrating in mass to Queens and the Bronx along with the Millennials raised up the child princess of Socialism, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
The Pope's early mentor was Esther Ballestrino de Careaga, a Paraguayan woman and a fervent communist. Those close to her smuggled her communist books, including Marx’s Das Kapital, into a “Jesuit library.” As the Pope aged, he combined later the aspect of the social manifest of communism with the social doctrine of the Church. These biographical details throw light on the pope’s ideological instincts. Yet many commentators have ignored them, breezily casting his leftism as a bit confused but basically harmless.
In the early twentieth century, as Marx’s socialism spread across the world, Pope Pius XI declared the theory anathema (formal curse by a pope). “No one can be at the same time a good Catholic and a true socialist,” he said. To hear Pope Francis speak today, one might conclude the reverse: that no can be at the same time a good Catholic and an opponent of socialism.
“Inequality is the root of all evil,” Pope Francis wrote on his Twitter account in 2014. One can imagine Karl Marx tweeting the same notion had he been alive today, but none of Francis’s predecessors would have made such an outrageous claim. According to traditional Catholic theology, the root of all evil came not from inequality but from Satan’s refusal to accept inequality. Out of envy of God’s superiority, Satan rebelled. He could not bear his lesser status. Socialism is a manifest of the principality of pride itself.
You see how the canvas of Good and Evil have been flipped? He was in effect the first revolutionary, which is why the socialist agitator and idealist for civic upheaval Saul Alinsky — a mentor to Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton (who did her senior thesis at Wellesley on his thought) — offered an “acknowledgment” in his book, Rules for Radicals, to Satan. Alinsky saw him as the first champion of the “have nots.”
Pope Francis does not represent the historical church, or even the biblical church, but is being guided by demonic overtures, insisting that his followers follow suite. Could we have imagined a pope happily receiving from a Latin American despot the “gift” of a crucifix shaped in the form of a Marxist hammer and sickle? That surreal scene happened during Pope Francis’s visit to Bolivia in July 2015. Evo Morales, Bolivia’s proudly Marxist president, offered the pontiff that sacrilegious image of Jesus Christ. Morales described the gift as a copy of a crucifix designed by a late priest, Fr. Luis Espinal, who belonged to the Jesuit order (as does Pope Francis) and had committed his life to melding Marxism with religion.
No one likes to talk about these facts. Most Catholics refuse to consider the dialog preferring ignorance, however their Catholic pope is ideologically corrupt, both mentally and spiritually unfit to represent anything remotely esteemed as of God. I say this as an apologist and autonomous ordained pastor for 35 years now.
The Pope's early mentor was Esther Ballestrino de Careaga, a Paraguayan woman and a fervent communist. Those close to her smuggled her communist books, including Marx’s Das Kapital, into a “Jesuit library.” As the Pope aged, he combined later the aspect of the social manifest of communism with the social doctrine of the Church. These biographical details throw light on the pope’s ideological instincts. Yet many commentators have ignored them, breezily casting his leftism as a bit confused but basically harmless.
In the early twentieth century, as Marx’s socialism spread across the world, Pope Pius XI declared the theory anathema (formal curse by a pope). “No one can be at the same time a good Catholic and a true socialist,” he said. To hear Pope Francis speak today, one might conclude the reverse: that no can be at the same time a good Catholic and an opponent of socialism.
“Inequality is the root of all evil,” Pope Francis wrote on his Twitter account in 2014. One can imagine Karl Marx tweeting the same notion had he been alive today, but none of Francis’s predecessors would have made such an outrageous claim. According to traditional Catholic theology, the root of all evil came not from inequality but from Satan’s refusal to accept inequality. Out of envy of God’s superiority, Satan rebelled. He could not bear his lesser status. Socialism is a manifest of the principality of pride itself.
You see how the canvas of Good and Evil have been flipped? He was in effect the first revolutionary, which is why the socialist agitator and idealist for civic upheaval Saul Alinsky — a mentor to Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton (who did her senior thesis at Wellesley on his thought) — offered an “acknowledgment” in his book, Rules for Radicals, to Satan. Alinsky saw him as the first champion of the “have nots.”
Pope Francis does not represent the historical church, or even the biblical church, but is being guided by demonic overtures, insisting that his followers follow suite. Could we have imagined a pope happily receiving from a Latin American despot the “gift” of a crucifix shaped in the form of a Marxist hammer and sickle? That surreal scene happened during Pope Francis’s visit to Bolivia in July 2015. Evo Morales, Bolivia’s proudly Marxist president, offered the pontiff that sacrilegious image of Jesus Christ. Morales described the gift as a copy of a crucifix designed by a late priest, Fr. Luis Espinal, who belonged to the Jesuit order (as does Pope Francis) and had committed his life to melding Marxism with religion.
No one likes to talk about these facts. Most Catholics refuse to consider the dialog preferring ignorance, however their Catholic pope is ideologically corrupt, both mentally and spiritually unfit to represent anything remotely esteemed as of God. I say this as an apologist and autonomous ordained pastor for 35 years now.